The Missing Chapter – A Personal View of Russia–Twenty Years After

20 years later... and a chapter is missing 300x200 The Missing Chapter – A Personal View of Russia–Twenty Years After

Every so often, one of my readers enquires as to why I do not write a book. The answer seems obvious enough: it has already been done. The libraries are groaning under the weight of millions of them – in our native France, everyone who can manage rudimentary verb conjugation feels compelled to bequeath his opus to an expectant world. With that many writers, who has the time to read? And besides, it has all been said already – and better – by Proust, by Borges, by Kafka, by the Great Russian classic authors of the 19th Century. What could I hope to add?

Yet when invited to contribute a chapter to a book being put together by one local financial institution, collectively authored by 20 (ah… make that 19…) of that first generation of expats involved in the creation of Russia’s first approximations to a capital market, and who were then mad enough to stick around as it all unravelled, crashed and burned (but to reincarnate in something rather less surrealistic), it seemed a very worthy undertaking.

I did caution them that my chapter was likely to be rather spicy; one of the wonderful things about Russia is that total absence of political correctness which we enjoy.

The story recaps some of the highlights of my 15 years before the mast – amidst the madness that was early post-Soviet Moscow, or at least what I can remember of it (no one who fully participated in the Great Party at the Edge of the Apocalypse made it out without sacrificing a few brain cells along the way…).

While I had imagined that I could jot it all down in an afternoon, I ultimately spent days, weeks, writing and re-writing what was meant to be an intensely personal account… an ego trip if you will, but that is what was requested of me. All in vain! My foray into the literary world was to fall victim to the very cowardice and group-think I have long decried in the Western media.

To make a long story short – while the initial drafts were received with great enthusiasm by the Moscow sponsor, when they forwarded the finalized version to London, the response from the publisher neatly summarized everything that is corrupt, cowardly, bent and cloyingly hypocritical about British Media and their coverage of Russia.

According to the UK publisher, to refer to convicted criminals – as “criminals”; to bent ministers – as “bent”; to purported journalists engaged in nothing more than propaganda-for-pay – as “propagandists” (thus avoiding a more colourful term) detracted from the credibility of my story.

In short, he demanded that my baby be gutted like an eel! Excerpts from his reptilian letter (highlighting is my own):

“… I am now attaching an edited version of the chapter by Eric Kraus. As discussed, as well as a more general edit, I have toned down the accusations and removed names where I think there might be problems. I believe the substantive points being made by the author are still there. More importantly I believe that the points being made are clearer and stronger for having been made less personal and more impartial.

… Being sued for libel is perhaps unlikely… What is much more likely is not being taken seriously – and that would be a pity because this chapter has the potential to make a valuable contribution with its first-hand/inside knowledge. Why might it not be taken seriously? Because personal accusations, whether true or not, will diminish the authority of the work (and of the book as a whole). There is no need to name names in quite the way that is proposed here. The same substantial points can be better made without this…”

Needless to say, T&B cleans such folk out from between his toes. I certainly do not intend to be censored by some pitiable denizen of a dying civilization that still imagines itself to rule the (air)waves. He – and his ilk – are fated to drown while clinging desperately to the status quo, as it disappears beneath the waves of history.

But – dear reader – let it be you who draws their own conclusions as to what adds – and what detracts – from the story! I have restored the London redactions, highlighted in blue. Do please tell whether you think it better with or without!

In fact, I would recommend that you buy the book, print my chapter, and just paste it in. I would be deeply gratified to find my little literary cripple in the company of the stories of my peers from those best – and worst – of times.

Given the effort which went into this Quixotic undertaking – I would strongly encourage all to forward around the present message to anyone who might be interested/amused/outraged – or best, some combination of all three.

To read the chapter click on the link below:

The Missing Chapter

This entry was posted in The Eternal Russia. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to The Missing Chapter – A Personal View of Russia–Twenty Years After

  1. chris cheang says:

    I first came to Russia in July 1980, stayed a few days, only to return in early 1994 and have lived here since, apart from a break of about 4 years. I too have watched its growth and development in the aftermath of the Soviet collapse.
    However, no foreigner can have a monopoly of truth and wisdom in any country, especially since he’s not native-born.

  2. Greg Minjack says:

    I was disappointed with only two elements of your chapter: 1) you didn’t name the person whom you described in the following passage, ” . . . one highly-placed American academic asserted to this author that “the Russians are so afraid of China they will be forced to beg a place under the American umbrella – whatever the price that Washington demands!” It is an illustration of the profoundly amateurish diplomacy of the Obama administration that the man in question has now attained great prominence in US Russian policy-making.” And, 2) you didn’t spend more space elaborating on how effective Yukos was in co-opting major Washington think-tanks through “donations” and “gifts.”

    • Ursa Major says:

      I was, of course, referring to McFool – now US Ambassador to Russia – as for the corruption of US NGOs, you are, of course, correct – but it would require an entire book to elucidate! Eric

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>